Monday, May 4, 2015
5/4
Today, Robert and I addressed a few design features on the obstacle course. We tested the Boe-Bot several times on the obstacle course, which resulted in needing to rearrange some of the electrical tape. We also talked about the final presentation with Mrs. Vestal. Lastly, we discussed edits we need to make in our report. We're nearing the end of the semester and we're looking forward to presenting our project!
Saturday, May 2, 2015
4/29
On Wednesday, we spent the entire day constructing the obstacle course out of foam core board, creating the electrical tape path, and programming the Boe-Bot to follow the electrical tape. We found line following programming for 3 QTI sensors online. We couldn't follow the programming given to us in the line follower attachment instructions because it was for 4 QTI sensors. We had to modify some of the online programming, but it worked! We ended up staying an extra two hours. The physics professor was kind enough to let us use the corner of his classroom during his class.
I took the foam core boards home and started drawing details on them to make them look more like roads.
We came in early on Friday and finished coloring the obstacle course as well as connecting the boards with packing tape and trying to figure out how to program the Boe-Bot to complete a continuous 3-point turn. Until this point, we had to stop and program the Boe-Bot for each individual movement needed to complete a 3-point turn during its performance of the routine. We knew we had to include subroutines in our programming, but we didn't know how. After looking for online advice, we learned how to create subroutines and added two different subroutines: one for stopping at intersections and one for pivoting backwards (useful for the 3-point turn). The programming took 4 hours to complete, but now the Roadbed 3000 completes a continuous route!!
This weekend Robert and I are working on the report. We divided the responsibilities and we plan to finish the report by Monday so that we can practice the presentation on Monday during class. Robert is a great partner and I'm looking forward to our final presentation! It's going to be great!
I took the foam core boards home and started drawing details on them to make them look more like roads.
We came in early on Friday and finished coloring the obstacle course as well as connecting the boards with packing tape and trying to figure out how to program the Boe-Bot to complete a continuous 3-point turn. Until this point, we had to stop and program the Boe-Bot for each individual movement needed to complete a 3-point turn during its performance of the routine. We knew we had to include subroutines in our programming, but we didn't know how. After looking for online advice, we learned how to create subroutines and added two different subroutines: one for stopping at intersections and one for pivoting backwards (useful for the 3-point turn). The programming took 4 hours to complete, but now the Roadbed 3000 completes a continuous route!!
This weekend Robert and I are working on the report. We divided the responsibilities and we plan to finish the report by Monday so that we can practice the presentation on Monday during class. Robert is a great partner and I'm looking forward to our final presentation! It's going to be great!
Tuesday, April 28, 2015
4/27
Before class today I felt there was endless work to be done in order to finish our project, but Robert and I were able to accomplish so much during class (we stayed an extra hour) that I can see the light at the end of the tunnel! We started by continuing our efforts with installing the line follower from last week. We were having trouble with our far right sensor. It sensed black, even when we put it on a completely white paper. It was really frustrating! After switching out the sensor and the corresponding wire, Robert and I decided to look for an option to use only 3 sensors for the line follower. We found a video of a line follower using only 3 sensors so we knew it was possible. Then we found a website that had the exact instructions and diagrams for what we wanted to do and it included the related programming. After reconstructing the whole line follower system and entering the programming, we tested each of the sensors and they worked! It was really exciting! We moved on to programming the Boe-Bot so that it would "follow" the line by moving along a black line on a white surface; however, when we tested the programming our Boe-Bot wouldn't move at all. We went back to the basics and tested the servos (wheels) and they didn't work. That was super frustrating, but we checked all of our connections and found out that our VIN, VDD switch was broken. The switch had chipped earlier in the project and now it wasn't functioning at all. Robert and I scrounged around the room for extra parts and we found an unused Boe-Bot so we switched the switches. We tested the line follower programming again and our Boe-Bot moved the distance of the electrical tape. It was so amazing to see our hard work....well working! We spent the last minutes of class planning out the obstacle course. Robert had brought in foam core and lego buildings to help us visualize the course. We searched online for the actual NC driving test route on Google Maps as remembered from experience and we started marking roads on the posterboard. We're nearing the end of the project and I'm really excited to present our final prototype! On Wednesday, Robert and I are going to construct and test the obstacle course and delegate report responsibilities.
Saturday, April 25, 2015
4/22
Today, Robert and I installed the line follower mechanism on our Boe-Bot. We also programmed and tested the line follower as seen in Figure 1; we are still in the process of troubleshooting it. The line follower mechanism allows the Boe-Bot to distinguish between light and dark areas. This quality is perfect for an obstacle course because we can lay down black electrical tape on a white background and program the Boe-Bot to "follow" the black electrical tape lines.
The last thing we did during class was plan out the obstacle course for the road test. The obstacle course is based on the actual route used for the NC road test. Figure 3 is the rough sketch we will use to create the obstacle course for the Boe-Bot to navigate. We've decided to use foam board as the foundation for the obstacle course and electrical tape as the lines for the Boe-Bot to follow. The obstacle course will be explained in detail next week when we start to construct it.
Figure 1 Adding the line follower to the standard Boe-Bot. |
Robert and I also discussed the required objectives our Boe-Bot will perform to match those of the North Carolina road test that teenagers complete in order to receive a state driver's license. Below, Figure 2 explains our list of objectives in order from start to finish. These objectives were researched online and recalled from personal experience taking the road test.
Figure 2 The list of tasks performed during a NC road test to be performed by the Boe-Bot. |
The last thing we did during class was plan out the obstacle course for the road test. The obstacle course is based on the actual route used for the NC road test. Figure 3 is the rough sketch we will use to create the obstacle course for the Boe-Bot to navigate. We've decided to use foam board as the foundation for the obstacle course and electrical tape as the lines for the Boe-Bot to follow. The obstacle course will be explained in detail next week when we start to construct it.
Figure 3 The rough sketch of the obstacle course that the Boe-Bot will navigate based on the actual route taken by students during the NC road test. |
Wednesday, April 22, 2015
4/20/15
Today, Robert and I met for the first time in 2 weeks. Robert explained to me the construction of the Boe-Bot (which he finished quite fast) and the basic programming tools. We downloaded the Parallax programming software and centered the servos (motors that turn the wheels). We proceeded to practice basic programming objectives out of the microcontroller handbook. Robert showed me the line follower and the obstacle course construction pieces he brought from home. They're perfect! For the rest of the week, we will continue to work on programming the Boe-Bot and designing the obstacle course!
Wednesday, April 15, 2015
4/15
I was not in class today, but Robert informed me he is going to take the Boe-Bot home and work on programming as well as finishing up constructing the device so that we can stay on schedule. Last week, I completed most of the paperwork so he could begin construction this week. During the planning phase, I informed Robert of my absences and we agreed this would be a good way to ensure everyone remained involved in the project even though we wouldn't be able to meet for two weeks.
4/13
I was absent on 4/13. However, Robert worked to stay on schedule by beginning to construct the Boe-Bot. On Monday, we hit our first obstacle. We didn't realize that the Boe-Bot had to be programmed before it was constructed and so Robert is working on integrating this new information into our WBS schedule. This new info may require additional work outside of the classroom.
Sunday, April 5, 2015
4/1
In class Robert and I started working on our Work Breakdown Structure (WBS); it still needs some finishing touches. We looked at previous groups' final reports. After viewing the different options for the final report, we decided that we're going to try using MindView software to standardize our report documents and presentation. Over spring break, we decided to finish our initial WBS and Gantt Chart and then start building the week after. Robert and I can't believe how fast this project is moving. We're worried and excited, but mostly we just hope we can remember everything we need to work on! It's just a bit overwhelming, but we can do it if we give it our best effort. I'm really grateful Robert is my partner because we compliment each other really well in our work ethic and engineering strengths and weaknesses.
Monday, March 30, 2015
Boe-Bot Final Project 3/30
Today, we reviewed how to write an effective problem statement. Robert and I finalized our problem statement, presented it to the class, and integrated feedback into our statement to make it more clear and specific. In our problem statement, we stated that we would base our RoadBot prototype on the NC state driving test, but this might change if another state driving test is more practical regarding the limits of programming. We also listened to the other teams present their ideas and provide feedback to help guide their preparation.
We started brainstorming objectives for our WBS. Robert and I are looking forward to finishing up our WBS and Gantt Chart and beginning to construct our Boe-Bot this week during lab class.
Saturday, March 28, 2015
3/25
Today was the first time we were able to view the parts of the Boe-Bot and look at the manuals. Last week, Robert and I developed an idea to use the Boe-Bot as a mail delivery device (featured on team consensus linked below). However, this idea was deemed unrealistic when we were made aware of the actual dimensions of the Boe-Bot (it is barely bigger than a sticky note). So, we went back to the drawing board.
Today, Robert and I worked on filling out our team contract and team consensus. We also worked on defining our problem statement and developing a realistic function for the Boe-Bot. We decided we'd like to create a Driver's Ed training device that Driver's Ed instructors use in the classroom to show the students the specific obstacles that will be tested on the state driving test. The Boe-bot will perform a set of programmed obstacles (ex: parallel parking and avoiding orange cones) in succession to simulate the state driving test. Although each state has a different driving test, the Boe-Bot can be customized for each state's test.
This week, we are also starting to work on our WBS (Work Breakdown Structure) for the Boe-Bot project. Robert and I know this will be a very detailed report of the procedures and steps necessary to complete this project and are a little intimidated because we don't want to leave a step out of the report or misjudge the respective time requirements for the objectives.
Today, Robert and I worked on filling out our team contract and team consensus. We also worked on defining our problem statement and developing a realistic function for the Boe-Bot. We decided we'd like to create a Driver's Ed training device that Driver's Ed instructors use in the classroom to show the students the specific obstacles that will be tested on the state driving test. The Boe-bot will perform a set of programmed obstacles (ex: parallel parking and avoiding orange cones) in succession to simulate the state driving test. Although each state has a different driving test, the Boe-Bot can be customized for each state's test.
This week, we are also starting to work on our WBS (Work Breakdown Structure) for the Boe-Bot project. Robert and I know this will be a very detailed report of the procedures and steps necessary to complete this project and are a little intimidated because we don't want to leave a step out of the report or misjudge the respective time requirements for the objectives.
Tuesday, March 24, 2015
The Start of the Final Project
This week we begin working on our Engineering Final Project. We were split into teams and given the assignment of designing, developing, and testing a Boe-Bot to solve a realistic problem. This week we begin by researching the electronic capabilities of a Boe-Bot and completing a Team Contract to set the ground rules for the project. My partner is Robert. The next step is to begin brainstorming possible problem statements. I'm really looking forward to this project because I've never built a robot before and Robert says he's really great at putting things together. I think there's a lot for me to learn and I'm excited!
Pizza WBS and Gantt Lab
Last week, we were divided into two teams and given the assignment of creating a Work Breakdown Structure and Gantt Chart for the project of ordering a pizza. On Lab day, I was sick so I didn't attend class when we actually tested our work by ordering pizza, but I helped create the two documents. They are found at the links below.
Work Breakdown Structure
Gantt Chart
Work Breakdown Structure
Gantt Chart
Sunday, March 22, 2015
Disciplines Report
This is the link to my Disciplines Report.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz1hT0ut1RNNNlJBUTRacFZWU25rNEotMWZmSjY5M1VvQVlB/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz1hT0ut1RNNNlJBUTRacFZWU25rNEotMWZmSjY5M1VvQVlB/view?usp=sharing
Sunday, March 15, 2015
Field Trip
On Wednesday March 4th, we took a field trip to the RATT Center to tour the building and learn about the variety of courses they offer there. A machining instructor guided us through the classrooms. He showed us the airplanes they house in the hanger as well as the machines the students use while training. We also saw a 3D printer in action! It was an awesome opportunity to talk to someone who has worked in a the engineering career environment and now teaches the courses required for preparation and success in today's work field.
Figure 1. Workbenches in a classroom. |
Figure 2. A 1948 machine that is still in operation. |
Figure 3. This machine cuts with water. |
Figure 4. A tabletop 3D printer. |
Figure 5. The software program for the 3D printer. |
WBS and Gantt Chart
A Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) is an outline of the time, materials, and funding needed to complete the objectives of a project. It can also distribute responsibilities among team members. WBSs can be made to look like flow charts or tables depending on the preferred visual representation and the amount of tasks.
A Gantt Chart is a visual representation of the time required to complete each portion of a project from start to finish. It can also label who is responsible for each task. In the following example of a Gantt Chart, each row represents a different task. The vertical columns represent time increments. A line is drawn from left (start) to right (finish) symbolizing the amount of time it will take to complete a task. Task time increments can overlap. The advantage of using this chart is that you can measure progress and determine if the project is on time by pointing at the current date and drawing an imaginary vertical line down the chart. All of the tasks to the left of the line should be completed. All of the tasks that meet the line should be in progress. All of the tasks to the right of the line are yet to be started. In most charts a horizontal timeline is filled in to represent progress or percent of the task completed. If an important event will occur during the project such as an inspection or presentation, these can be noted on the Gantt chart with designated symbols instead of horizontal lines. These events are referred to as milestones.
Source of information and Figure 2: http://www.me.umn.edu/courses/me4054/assignments/wbsgantt.html
Figure 1. An example of a work breakdown structure with a visual flow of information. Source: http://www.criticaltools.com/projwbs.htm |
A Gantt Chart is a visual representation of the time required to complete each portion of a project from start to finish. It can also label who is responsible for each task. In the following example of a Gantt Chart, each row represents a different task. The vertical columns represent time increments. A line is drawn from left (start) to right (finish) symbolizing the amount of time it will take to complete a task. Task time increments can overlap. The advantage of using this chart is that you can measure progress and determine if the project is on time by pointing at the current date and drawing an imaginary vertical line down the chart. All of the tasks to the left of the line should be completed. All of the tasks that meet the line should be in progress. All of the tasks to the right of the line are yet to be started. In most charts a horizontal timeline is filled in to represent progress or percent of the task completed. If an important event will occur during the project such as an inspection or presentation, these can be noted on the Gantt chart with designated symbols instead of horizontal lines. These events are referred to as milestones.
Figure 2. An example of a Gantt chart. |
Source of information and Figure 2: http://www.me.umn.edu/courses/me4054/assignments/wbsgantt.html
Tuesday, March 10, 2015
Transportation Success/ Failure
Professor Vestal assigned each student an example of a transportation success and a transportation failure. It is our task to research and summarize the various aspects of each structure and present our findings to the class. My assigned transportation success is the Forth Bridge in Scotland.
Transportation Success: Forth Bridge, Scotland
Location: The Forth Bridge stretches from South Queensferry to North Queensferry in Scotland. This area received a lot of ferry traffic and the increase in railway transportation in the late 1800s emphasized a need for a bridge at this location.
When: Construction of the Forth Bridge began in 1883 and it was opened for operation in 1890.
Type of bridge: Cantilever
The Forth Bridge consists of three cantilever structures situated on granite platforms. Cantilevers are supported on one side and carry a load on the other.
Significant attributes: The Forth Bridge is regarded as the first 100% steel bridge in Britain. Additionally, the Forth Bridge was an attempt to achieve a successful transportation system in the area after the collapse of the Tay Bridge in 1879.
Dimensions: Height: cantilevers are 100 m (110m above surface of water at high tide)
Weight: 53,000 tons
Length: 2.5 km (521 m cantilever spans)
Cost: About 3 million pounds
Awards: At the time of construction, the spans of the individual cantilevers (521 m) were the longest and second longest in the world and remained so for 28 years. The Forth Bridge is still the longest cantilever bridge in the world. The Forth Bridge is protected as a Category A site in Scotland with national importance and is currently a nominee for a UNESCO World Heritage Site.
Unique Features: This year is Forth Bridge's 125th anniversary. It underwent a major paint-job restoration from 2001-2011 and there are plans for a viewing platform and a thrill climb (gallery and videos at this site) to be opened in the next year or so. The Forth Bridge is also known for its red oxide paint, which was color matched during the bridge's restoration paint job (Figures 1-3 below).
Why was this bridge a success? The Forth Bridge is a success because it has fulfilled its purpose for 125 years and remained in good working condition. Additionally, it has become an internationally recognized bridge.
Transportation Failure: Arroyo Pasajero Twin Bridges
Location: The Arroyo Pasajero Twin Bridges were located near Coalinga, California over the Arroyo Pasajero Creek.
When: The twin bridges were built in 1967 and they collapsed twenty years ago today, March 10, 1995.
Type of bridge/Significant attributes: I could not find the type of bridge stated outright, but I do know that the twin bridges included wing walls, vertical abutments, and three piers made of six columns each. A web wall was later added to provide extra support to the groups of columns.
Dimensions: 122 ft long
Cost: I did not find the original cost of the bridge. However, the bridge that replaced the Arroyo Pasajero bridges after they collapsed cost $6 million. Additionally, travel time lost due to the collapse cost local residents $550,000.
Unique Features: The bridges operated as a 4-lane interstate (Interstate 5).
Why did the Arroyo Pasajero Twin Bridges fail?
Several factors contributed to the collapse of the Arroyo Pasajero bridges. The main factors include flooding, lack of planning for a web wall, increased drainage, limited space for flow, long-term degradation, scouring, and lack of adequate steel supports for columns.
At the time the bridge collapsed, California was experiencing the effects of El Nino, which included relentless storms that led to major flooding. Several years prior to the collapse in 1969, there was another flood that lowered the bed of the creek 6 ft. A web wall was constructed after this flood to provide extra support for the columns. After construction, the Arroyo Pasajero Creek was connected by a manmade channel to Chino Creek. This channel increased the amount of drainage in Arroyo Pasajero Creek by 33%. Additionally, the creek width upstream of the 122 ft bridge was 300-400 ft. The flow of water in this larger width was limited by the bridge, leading to a build-up of water during the 1995 flooding. Between the time of construction and the time of the collapse, the land level had been reduced 10 ft by degradation (wearing down of soil). During the flooding, scouring (erosion of soil around supports) exposed a depth of the columns that did not have steel supports. These factors combined to undermine the strength of the bridges and the bridges collapsed.
Bridge replacement modifications and redesign: The twin bridges were effectively replaced in 10 days. The newly redesigned bridge was built with a railroad flatcar superstructure, steel supports, a concrete column foundation, and a steel grate surface covered in trench plates and rubberized asphalt (Figures 1-3 below).
Why were the Arroyo Twin Bridges a failure? They failed in their purpose to provide safe and reliable transportation. Additionally, they were not properly maintained, which led to the death of seven people.
Sources:
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/publicroads/98julaug/planning.cfm
http://www.nytimes.com/1995/03/12/us/heavy-rains-roll-their-destructive-way-down-california-coast.html
http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/I-5-Tragedy-Unites-Residents-Of-Rough-and-Tumble-3041270.php
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/publicroads/95fall/p95au2.cfm
http://isddc.dot.gov/OLPFiles/FHWA/010590.pdf
http://water.usgs.gov/edu/earthgwlandsubside.html
Transportation Success: Forth Bridge, Scotland
Location: The Forth Bridge stretches from South Queensferry to North Queensferry in Scotland. This area received a lot of ferry traffic and the increase in railway transportation in the late 1800s emphasized a need for a bridge at this location.
When: Construction of the Forth Bridge began in 1883 and it was opened for operation in 1890.
Type of bridge: Cantilever
The Forth Bridge consists of three cantilever structures situated on granite platforms. Cantilevers are supported on one side and carry a load on the other.
Significant attributes: The Forth Bridge is regarded as the first 100% steel bridge in Britain. Additionally, the Forth Bridge was an attempt to achieve a successful transportation system in the area after the collapse of the Tay Bridge in 1879.
Dimensions: Height: cantilevers are 100 m (110m above surface of water at high tide)
Weight: 53,000 tons
Length: 2.5 km (521 m cantilever spans)
Cost: About 3 million pounds
Awards: At the time of construction, the spans of the individual cantilevers (521 m) were the longest and second longest in the world and remained so for 28 years. The Forth Bridge is still the longest cantilever bridge in the world. The Forth Bridge is protected as a Category A site in Scotland with national importance and is currently a nominee for a UNESCO World Heritage Site.
Unique Features: This year is Forth Bridge's 125th anniversary. It underwent a major paint-job restoration from 2001-2011 and there are plans for a viewing platform and a thrill climb (gallery and videos at this site) to be opened in the next year or so. The Forth Bridge is also known for its red oxide paint, which was color matched during the bridge's restoration paint job (Figures 1-3 below).
Why was this bridge a success? The Forth Bridge is a success because it has fulfilled its purpose for 125 years and remained in good working condition. Additionally, it has become an internationally recognized bridge.
Figure 1: Full view of the Forth Bridge |
Figure 2: Train crossing the Forth Bridge |
Figure 3: The underside of the Forth Bridge (structural layout) |
Transportation Success Presentation
Sources:
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/214233/Forth-Bridge
http://forth-bridges.co.uk
http://www.railway-technology.com/projects/forth-rail-bridge-firth-scotland/
http://www.forthbridgeexperience.com
Transportation Failure: Arroyo Pasajero Twin Bridges
Location: The Arroyo Pasajero Twin Bridges were located near Coalinga, California over the Arroyo Pasajero Creek.
When: The twin bridges were built in 1967 and they collapsed twenty years ago today, March 10, 1995.
Type of bridge/Significant attributes: I could not find the type of bridge stated outright, but I do know that the twin bridges included wing walls, vertical abutments, and three piers made of six columns each. A web wall was later added to provide extra support to the groups of columns.
Dimensions: 122 ft long
Cost: I did not find the original cost of the bridge. However, the bridge that replaced the Arroyo Pasajero bridges after they collapsed cost $6 million. Additionally, travel time lost due to the collapse cost local residents $550,000.
Unique Features: The bridges operated as a 4-lane interstate (Interstate 5).
Why did the Arroyo Pasajero Twin Bridges fail?
Several factors contributed to the collapse of the Arroyo Pasajero bridges. The main factors include flooding, lack of planning for a web wall, increased drainage, limited space for flow, long-term degradation, scouring, and lack of adequate steel supports for columns.
At the time the bridge collapsed, California was experiencing the effects of El Nino, which included relentless storms that led to major flooding. Several years prior to the collapse in 1969, there was another flood that lowered the bed of the creek 6 ft. A web wall was constructed after this flood to provide extra support for the columns. After construction, the Arroyo Pasajero Creek was connected by a manmade channel to Chino Creek. This channel increased the amount of drainage in Arroyo Pasajero Creek by 33%. Additionally, the creek width upstream of the 122 ft bridge was 300-400 ft. The flow of water in this larger width was limited by the bridge, leading to a build-up of water during the 1995 flooding. Between the time of construction and the time of the collapse, the land level had been reduced 10 ft by degradation (wearing down of soil). During the flooding, scouring (erosion of soil around supports) exposed a depth of the columns that did not have steel supports. These factors combined to undermine the strength of the bridges and the bridges collapsed.
Bridge replacement modifications and redesign: The twin bridges were effectively replaced in 10 days. The newly redesigned bridge was built with a railroad flatcar superstructure, steel supports, a concrete column foundation, and a steel grate surface covered in trench plates and rubberized asphalt (Figures 1-3 below).
Why were the Arroyo Twin Bridges a failure? They failed in their purpose to provide safe and reliable transportation. Additionally, they were not properly maintained, which led to the death of seven people.
Figure 1: Caption located on digital image. |
Figure 2: Replacement bridge after the twin bridges collapsed. |
Figure 3: Underside of the new bridge. |
Transportation Failure Presentation
Clarification: Today in class, I said the twin bridges were made up of two bridges, each carrying two lanes of one way traffic. However, this was an assumption based on the information I had read and collected.
Clarification: Today in class, I said the twin bridges were made up of two bridges, each carrying two lanes of one way traffic. However, this was an assumption based on the information I had read and collected.
Sources:
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/publicroads/98julaug/planning.cfm
http://www.nytimes.com/1995/03/12/us/heavy-rains-roll-their-destructive-way-down-california-coast.html
http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/I-5-Tragedy-Unites-Residents-Of-Rough-and-Tumble-3041270.php
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/publicroads/95fall/p95au2.cfm
http://isddc.dot.gov/OLPFiles/FHWA/010590.pdf
http://water.usgs.gov/edu/earthgwlandsubside.html
Sunday, March 8, 2015
Egg Drop Math/Lessons Learned
The math behind the egg drop project:
Figure 1: Potential and kinetic energy equations for the egg drop. |
Basically, the egg's potential energy and kinetic energy remains constant throughout the drop; however, the respective values of the potential and kinetic energy change. Before the egg is dropped, the egg has a certain amount of potential energy. After the egg is dropped and as the egg is falling, the original potential energy is converted into kinetic energy. Right before the egg makes contact with the egg catcher, the egg has reached its peak value of kinetic energy and has essentially no potential energy.
Note: The "m" in the parentheses in the last step of the math stands for "height in meters."
Lessons Learned
1. One person never has all the ideas and/or resources to complete the project
Megan and I depended on one another to brainstorm ideas we thought might work for the design of our contraption. Additionally, we searched the Internet for successful precedents for our project; however, we didn't find any products that matched our criteria. So Megan and I worked to design a product we thought would work. We both contributed to the design and worked to combine our ideas. JTEC (our egg catcher) was a combination of both our valuable efforts!
2. It's ok to go back to the drawing board
Megan and I revised our design several times in order to achieve a satisfactory final product. As we went on in the design process, new knowledge came to our attention, which encouraged us to rethink our original plans. Our product developed in quality due to these opportunities for revision.
3. Asking for help is not a weakness
Throughout the design process, Megan and I asked and received help from other teams. Cameron taught us how to drop the egg to increase our accuracy and precision (terms we learned about in a previous chapter). Team Canada helped us drop our last egg by holding the measuring tape 16 ft in the air while we set up our contraption. Engineers cannot survive alone. We are collaborative by nature.
Overall, I really enjoyed this project and I think I have a better understanding of the engineering design process and its importance! Doing the work takes time, but it's definitely necessary!
Notes from Chapter 4, Thinking Like an Engineer
- Introduction ParagraphCommunication is a necessary and valuable skill in the field of engineering. Anyone can have a great idea, but those who are able to communicate their ideas to others and gain their support are much more likely to succeed in their endeavors.
- Basic Presentation SkillsPreplanning5 Ws and 1 H
Who is my audience?
What is my purpose?
Where is all the equipment I need? Where will the talk be held?
When am I on the program agenda?
Why am I giving this talk?
How long should I talk?
Preparing the Verbal Elements
4 -S Formula
Keep the speech
Short- short sentences, short length of speech
Simple- avoid wordy phrases
Strong- use active voice
Sincere- convey respect for audience
Three Structural Parts
Introduction- capture attention
Body- keep attention, two or three main points, simple examples
Conclusion- summarize, show appreciation, and answer a few questions
Preparing Visual Aids
Keep slides simple- one concept per slide/six lines per slide/60 seconds
Use landscape format
Use simple graphs instead of lists and tables
Test the visibility of visual aids (videos, diagrams, pictures,etc.)
Use bullet points not complete sentences
Use large size text (18-24 at minimum)
Use clearly visible formatting for words and visuals
Use light background/dark print
Keep background simple and consistent throughout presentation
- Sample Presentations
Figure 1: Sample Presentation 1
Figure 2: Sample Presentation 2
Figure 3: Sample Presentation 3
From these three sample presentations, I recognize the importance of simple formatting and easy-to-understand concepts. Backgrounds and slide layouts should be open (not cramped) and bright so as to support visibility on large screens.Additionally, graphics (tables, figures, and videos) should be straight-forward and discuss one concept. Figures should not be redundant or inappropriately sized. Figures should also be accompanied by explanations of the data to ensure understanding. - Presentation Dos and Don’tsDo:
Relax
Speak slowly/clearly and with appropriate eye contact
Use proper hand gestures
Rehearse presentation out loud
Arrive early to set up and solve any issues that may arise
Do not:
Lean on objects, turn back to audience, or cover your mouth
Read presentation word for word
Include inappropriate content
Use fillers ("uh" or "um"), stammer, or overuse words and phrases
Chew gum or fidget with surroundings
Shuffle feet/pace/slouch
Play with note cards
- Basic Technical Writing Skills
Be clear
Use 10 pt font size and 1.5 line spacing
Use past tense verbs
Define unfamiliar terms and acronyms to reader
Present facts not feelings
Be professional in tone
Number/caption tables, figures, and appendices
Tables: numbers and captions appear above the object
Figures: numbers and captions appear below the object
Proofread/edit
Check formatting, spelling, and grammar
Read the document twice
1. Check technical content
2. Check flow
- remove unnecessary content
- Read the document aloud and follow the pace of punctuation (ex: pause appropriately for commas, colons, semi colons, and periods)
- peer review
Spell out numbers that start a sentence (Ex: Two ducks sat on a bench.)
Keep leading zeros in decimals (Ex: The candy cost $0.79 per pound.)
Do not spell out long numbers (Ex: I saw 1,000 cars on the highway.)
Use dollar symbol (Ex: The DVD cost $20.)
Use significant figures/be reasonable
Ex: The tomato weighed 52.154 grams. NO
The tomato weighed 52 grams. YES
- Proper Use of ReferencesABCs of evaluating info
A: Authority
Who is responsible for the info?
Is the author/organization a credible source on this subject?
B: Bias
Is the information presented objectively?
What is the author's purpose?
C: Currency
How current is the information?
Additional Tips for Evaluating Info
-Seek for sources reviewed by experts
-Use articles that have secured peer-reviews by experts
- Compare information from several sources to gain depth/quality
"Until you compare several sources, you will not know what you are missing!"
- Corroborate information; Compare information from several sources to establish what info is fact and what info is opinion
7. E-mails to your college Instructors
-Choose an appropriate email name for professional use
-Address recipient with correct title
-Use appropriate subject lines
-Close your e-mail with your full name and contact info; include course number and meeting day/time
- Ensure your sending name is your full name or an appropriate nickname (Ex: Zachary Williams or Zack Williams)
- Keep it simple, brief, and easy to read
-Clearly define the action you desire from the recipient (Ex: Please explain the procedure for finding the answer to the following homework problem.)
- Use correct spelling, grammar, and formatting; avoid texting language
-Be professional
-Fill in the To: and CC: lines after writing the e-mail to avoid sending the e-mail before you are finished writing and editing it
- Allow 48-72 hours for a reply; If the matter is urgent, you can send a follow-up message asking if the original message was received and/or seek out a meeting or telephone conversation
Wednesday, March 4, 2015
Egg Drop Final Test!
Last Wednesday, we finally tested our egg drop contraption, which Megan and I named the JTEC (Jamestown Egg Catcher) because Mrs. Vestal said it looks like a Jamestown fort!
First, we weighed three different eggs (Well, actually four because one rolled off the scale). We named our eggs EA, MA, and AM.
We successfully dropped and caught our first two eggs, but on our third drop I hesitated and accidentally aimed outside of the catcher causing the egg to fall on Lia's phone, which was strategically placed on the ground near the egg catcher facing up so that we could film the egg falling. Sorry Lia! Because of our success during the first two drops, Megan and I agreed not to make changes to our contraption during the final tests.
These are the results:
The hardest part of the drop test was measuring the height accurately, which meant the person dropping the egg had to measure the height with a tape measure in one hand and hold the plum bob in the other. However, the other teams worked to help us with this task and that made it easier.
Finally, part of our lab project included finding the math behind the egg drop and solving for the final velocity of the egg just before it hits the catcher or the floor.
Mrs. Vestal helped us figure out the math and explained the reason behind it:
First, we weighed three different eggs (Well, actually four because one rolled off the scale). We named our eggs EA, MA, and AM.
We dropped each egg in order of weight, greatest to least, while increasing our dropping heights.
Here is a video of our second drop (Jordyn took this video!)
We successfully dropped and caught our first two eggs, but on our third drop I hesitated and accidentally aimed outside of the catcher causing the egg to fall on Lia's phone, which was strategically placed on the ground near the egg catcher facing up so that we could film the egg falling. Sorry Lia! Because of our success during the first two drops, Megan and I agreed not to make changes to our contraption during the final tests.
These are the results:
The hardest part of the drop test was measuring the height accurately, which meant the person dropping the egg had to measure the height with a tape measure in one hand and hold the plum bob in the other. However, the other teams worked to help us with this task and that made it easier.
Finally, part of our lab project included finding the math behind the egg drop and solving for the final velocity of the egg just before it hits the catcher or the floor.
Mrs. Vestal helped us figure out the math and explained the reason behind it:
Basically, the egg's potential energy and kinetic energy remains constant throughout the drop; however, the respective values of the potential and kinetic energy change. Before the egg is dropped, the egg has a certain amount of potential energy. After the egg is dropped and as the egg is falling, the original potential energy is converted into kinetic energy. Right before the egg makes contact with the egg catcher, the egg has reached its peak value of kinetic energy and has essentially no potential energy.
Note: The "m" in the parentheses in the last step of the math stands for "height in meters."
So for our three drops:
Egg 1 (drop 2) velocity: 7.25 m/s final kinetic energy: 1.6 J
Egg 2 (drop 1) velocity: 6.58 m/s final kinetic energy: 1.41 J
Egg 3 (drop 3) velocity: 9.80 m/s final kinetic energy: 2.72 J
Overall, this was a great learning experience and I really enjoyed working in teams. Megan is an awesome partner and I feel really excited that our catcher worked! We came in second place and I think we fulfilled our goal of creating an effective egg catcher. Go JTEC! If the first place team combined the top of their catcher (which looks like a wrestling ring) with the base of our catcher, we would create a world class egg catcher because our base is a bit more stable than theirs and their top has a larger catching area. I'm so glad engineers are collaborative because it leads to wonderful solutions!
Sunday, March 1, 2015
Notes From Chapter 2, Thinking Like an Engineer
- Introduction
Engineers can make decisions that affect thousands of people
Practice analyzing and making ethical decisions daily, it will make the process easier when you are faced with a major decision
2 reasons people make ethical decisions:
Desire to make the world a better place for everyone (altruism)
Desire to avoid unpleasant consequences
The majority of ancient and modern societies have developed rules, laws, and regulations to specify unacceptable behavior and punishments for said behavior
(going back to Code of Ur Nammu)
Religions also establish codes of conduct
- Ethical Decision Making
No set of rules or algorithms that ensure the most ethical decision is being made in a situation
The following four-step process guides people in considering questions with ethical aspects and consequences
- The four step procedure with original (not from book) examples to illustrate your pointsExample: Nannies who give active children sleeping medicine/alcohol to calm them down.1. Determine what the issues are and who (stakeholders) might be affected by the various alternative courses of action that might be implemented.Issues:Giving drugs/alcohol to children on a regular or periodic basisParental consentHealth of childrenThe responsibilities associated with being a nannyStakeholders:Children and their physical and emotional health
ParentsNanniesDoctors
2. Consider the effects of alternative courses of action from different perspectives.Perspective 1: Consequences (how does each alternative plan affect the different stakeholders)
Children: Physical health/influence on body functions
Legal ramifications depending on the substance used to sedate the child
Substance abuse/dependence/withdrawal and corresponding treatment
Perspective 2: Intent (intentions of the person doing the action in question)
(a) Is the action I am taking something that I believe everyone should do?
NO
(b) Do I believe that this sort of behavior should be codified in law?
NO
(c) Would I like to be on the receiving end (the victim) of this action?
NO
Perspective 3: Character (attributes of the person considering the action)
(a) Would a person of good character do this?
NO
(b) If I do this, does it enhance or degrade my character?
YES, it will degrade my character and my ability to handle tough situations. Overactive children need extra attention, not induced sleep.
(c) Would a person I revere as a person of unimpeachable character (whoever that might be) would take this action?
NO
3. Correlate perspectives. (Consider the results of the three perspectives and come to a conclusion; if no conclusion is apparent, reconsider the question in greater detail; if no conclusion is apparent still, go with 2/3 perspectives)
4. Act. (Carry-out the necessary actions related to the conclusion reached in the previous step)
If you are a nanny, do not use sleeping medicine/alcohol to calm an active child."Do I have the courage to do what I know is right?"YES - The three perspectives (consequences, intent, and character discussed above)
- Comment on each of the examples in 2.1 (your thoughts, not a repeat of textbook)
Example 2-1: Consider the question of whether to allow further drilling for oil in the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). List several issues and stakeholders.
Issues:
Gas prices
Sustainable energy
Disruption of the ecosystem
Disruption of life for local residents
Stock market
Stakeholders:
Oil companies
Employees (local and foreign)
Ecosystem organisms
Foreign relations
Stockholders in oil companies
Local residents
My ethical opinion:
I am not an oil company or an environmentalist, but I know there are other areas to drill for oil instead of the National Wildlife Refuge. These should be considered as valid options since drilling in the ANWR may have negative effects on the local wildlife and residents.
Example 2-2: Should all U.S. children be fingerprinted when entering kindergarten and again each third year of grade school (3, 6, 9, 12)? Identify the stakeholders and consequences.
Stakeholders:
Software companies and developers (database configuration)
U.S. children and their families
U.S. government
U.S. law enforcement departments
cyber hackers
ink companies
Consequences:
Record of U.S. children
Confidentiality precautions
Risk of cyber hacking for info
My ethical opinion:
To be honest, I don't know enough about this situation to argue for or against it. What I do know is if this action is allowed, parents will have to be convinced this action is in their children's best interest.
Example 2-3: Should you download music illegally over the Internet?
My ethical opinion:
No, it's stealing.
Example 2-4: Your friends are deriding another student behind her back because she comes from a poor family and does not have good clothes.
Do you:
(a) Join in the criticism? NO
(b) Ignore it, pretend it is not happening, or simply walk away? NO
(c) Tell your friends that they are behaving badly and insist that they desist? YES
- Would a person of good character do this? YES
- If I do this, does it enhance or degrade my character? ENHANCE MY CHARACTER, I will be standing up for my friend instead of allowing my friends' potential reactions to keep me from doing what I think is right.
- Would a person I revere as a person of unimpeachable character (whoever that might be) would take this action? YES
Example 2-5: Your company has been granted a contract to develop the next generation of electronic cigarette, also known as "nicotine delivery system," and you have been assigned to the design team. Can you in good conscience contribute your expertise to this project.
My ethical opinion:
No, I cannot in good conscience contribute my expertise to this project. I do not endorse smoking. I will not work on projects that promote actions I do not promote in my own life. Someone else may feel passionately supportive about the actions of this project and I would rather they dedicate their time and efforts to this work. They would probably provide higher quality results due to their positive attitude towards this project than someone who feels negatively towards the project.
- Plagiarism
Plagiarism is presenting someone's work as your own.
Plagiarism is regarded as academic dishonesty.
If a work contains small phrases or instances of wordings similar to another source, it is most likely accidental.
If a work contains several instances of such things, the probability of plagiarism is high.
But it comes down to intent: Did you voluntarily copy a portion of someone else's work and present it as your own without giving them credit?
- Engineering CreedI thought a direct quote of the creed from the book would be more effective than summarizing its tenants. Please find the creed below.
This provides further evidence that engineers are collaborative to the core. They know they cannot succeed alone and they don't pretend otherwise. - Social Responsibility
Engineers develop skills and have access to resources that allow them to solve technical problems; however, their work does not stop there. These skills and resources should be used to solve issues on a local or global scale. Solving problems and enhancing lives does not stop when engineers leave the office or lab.
- In your opinion how do an Engineer’s ethics affect public safety
The ethics of individual engineers affect their reasoning and decisions, which result in projects and goals that are designed to influence the life of the public.
10. Write about how all of this relates to “The Whole Life Concept”
Ethics lends itself to these four principles.
Passion: Ethical standings vary from person to person based on their experiences, beliefs, values, and biases. Ethical standings can be shared with an abundance of emotional energy.
Impact: Ethics affect the way we act, think, and speak as individuals, which in turn affects the lives of those around us.
Knowledge: We often use facts as evidence for our ethical standings. Ethical values influence the way we APPLY objective knowledge for various subjective purposes.
Application: We apply our ethical standings in our daily lives by allowing them to dictate where we go, what we do, what we wear, what we say, what we think, what we accept, what we reject, etc.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)